Re: Bundling Console_Getopt with the PEAR package

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jan Schneider, el jueves 3 de julio a las 16:03 me escribiste: > Zitat von Pierre-Alain Joye <paj@pearfr.org>: > > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 13:46:02 +0200 > > Jan Schneider <jan@horde.org> wrote: > > > > > Now imagine what happens if Console_Getopt is removed as a standalone > > > package from PEAR... > > > > That's why Tomas asked it. The idea is to prevent such bad events. That > > said, once we clearly announce that some weeks before do it, that should > > not be a problem. > > This is crap. You'll never know if there is a supercool tool out there that > depends on a pear package that will never ever release any new version. > PEAR packages should NEVER be removed IMO. Let them be unmaintained, > outdated, ugly; you just don't know if it's used anywhere. Agree. Maybe adding some "unmantained" tag would be nice to let new developers know the package is not been manteined. Or simply removing the mantainers from packages.xml. - -- LUCA - Leandro Lucarella - Usando Debian GNU/Linux Sid - GNU Generation - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ E-Mail / JID: luca@lugmen.org.ar GPG Fingerprint: D9E1 4545 0F4B 7928 E82C 375D 4B02 0FE0 B08B 4FB2 GPG Key: gpg --keyserver pks.lugli.org.ar --recv-keys B08B4FB2 - ------------------------------------------------------------------------ When you are at Rome live in the Roman style; when you are elsewhere live as they live elsewhere. -- St. Ambrose -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/BFHpSwIP4LCLT7IRArNbAJ4x1Cz2sV64KIM4EWab4A9I1yLvogCgmxQQ jLcN4jyrQkUmPUFe6VP2Heo= =zGd/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----