Re: feature (add-on) MDB proposal

"Lukas Smith" <smith@backendmedia.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 009d01c34485$47a37660$4d00a8c0@vandal... > ah just a little mistake on your part. > MDB picks up the fact that you have defined a sequence on a table that > hasn't been defined, since you forgot to add the prefix to the on tag as > well: > > <sequence> > <name>users_sequence</name> > <start>1</start> > <on> > <field>user_id</field> > <table><variable>prefix</variable>users</table> > </on> > </sequence> > > Then things should work. > > So is that a good enough solution for you? > All fine for me. I could now re-open the feature (table-prefix) in my project HTML_SetupWizard Thanks a lot Lucas ! > Anyways I would really like to thank you for the very clean work you > did; makes evaluation a breeze. I hope to hear more suggestions like > that from you (or any other user for that matter). > It was a pleasure for me because i like the works you've done on MDB. BTW did you know, or any other PEAR user, a solution to parse / transform into XML a phpMyAdmin style dump (native sql orders). Thanks in advance :o) > Well this will be sort of tricky. > The differences there might be very hard to abstract. I hope that in the > future more drivers will become capable of listing and creating users. > However when it comes to managing users rights I think that is still > fairly far off. But as always this could be done by someone else. > However I would be hesitant to quickly integrate a MySQL specific > solution, as this might make things difficult further down the roadin > terms of API breakage. However it might be worthwhile to develop a MySQL > specific solution as a separate class which uses MDB. > I understand your point of view; it was just an idea / suggestion ! Keep up the good works Lucas I'm not alone to tell that we love MDB Laurent