Re: why don't most classes extend PEAR?

From: Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2001 20:35:14 +0000
Subject: Re: why don't most classes extend PEAR?
Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1838@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Fri, 07 Sep 2001 12:12:16 -0700, greg keraunen wrote: >The problem is that I downloaded the current cvs tree and put it in my >include_path. The current PEAR.php calls dl(PEAR.so) which is not on my >system. Ahh, obviously you are using the wrong PEAR.php :-). Have a look at PEAR.php in php4/pear (not in php4/pear/PEAR/). >I don't understand what is going on with the PEAR.php file and why it >has been changed to require PEAR.so. You can use php4/pear/PEAR/PEAR.php if you want to work with the error handling functions Stig Bakken once converted from PHP to C. But since this C code isn't up to date, you should use the file I mentioned above. - Martin

« previous php.pear.dev (#1838) next »