Re: why don't most classes extend PEAR?
| From: | greg keraunen | Date: | Sat, 08 Sep 2001 08:48:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: why don't most classes extend PEAR? | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1845@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Martin Jansen wrote:
> >Is it going to move eventually?
>
> PEAR.php will stay in php4/pear because it should be delivered with
> each new PHP release (as I said a few days before: PEAR.php as some
> kind of VIP status, because it is used by a lot of [perhaps also by
> most] PEAR components).
I guess I should have asked, is it going to be replicated in pear/?
I'm not trying to go round and round the pear tree here :-)
It just seems awkward to have one special VIP file that people have to
get from php4/pear and all the rest come from pear/.
- greg