Re: why don't most classes extend PEAR?
| From: | (Stig Sæther Bakken) | Date: | Sat, 08 Sep 2001 03:23:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: why don't most classes extend PEAR? | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-1842@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
[greg keraunen <gk@proliberty.com>]
> Martin Jansen wrote:
> > Ahh, obviously you are using the wrong PEAR.php :-). Have a look at
> > PEAR.php in php4/pear (not in php4/pear/PEAR/).
>
> I wasn't looking in php4 at all. I read some messages that seemed to
> imply that the new home for pear was in pear directory.
>
> Are you saying that php4/pear is the official home of pear? If so, what
> is the purpose of pear directory?
php4/pear/ was the official home for pear, now it is pear/. All new
packages should go into pear/, and most of the code in php4/pear/ will
be moved there eventually (when people can install stuff from pear/
without using CVS).
- Stig
--
Stig Sæther Bakken <ssb@alltheweb.com>
Fast Search & Transfer ASA, Trondheim, Norway