new bug and idea for PEAR_PackageFileManager

Hello Greg, As i've already told you, i wanted to finish my own packages docs before have a new look on PEAR_PackageFileManager. Well, it was some counting delay with found of a new bug. Now i'll explain : I've a package to prepare and my sources are as follow \HTML_Progress index.html <--- i should have renamed it to index.htm (explain below) \apidoc where are my package API documentation generated by phpDocumentor 1.2.1 (marvellous tools) and as you already know it there is a file named index.html in this dir \docs my quick tutorial to use my package; it's also an index.html file \examples usage example of my package Then, with keeping the index.html file on root of \HTML_Progress and using this script of generation (see source file => http://farell.free.fr/en/pear/temp/show.php?HTML_Progress.php ) I have ALL INDEX.HTML files ignored; - the one in \HTML_Progress of course ( wanted ) - the one in \apidoc - the one in \docs I regret to have loose this 2 previous, so i decided to rename the first at root of \HTML_Progress into index.htm and all works fine. CAUSE: ignore option run recursively and in my case it's not what i want; i want to ignore only the first file on root After that i got a perfect package.xml : see source http://farell.free.fr/en/pear/temp/show.php?package.xml If i've missed something in " ignore " option , please tell me ! NOW, for the idea : Why not include in PEAR_PackageFileManager the tarball generation part as i did it in http://farell.free.fr/en/pear/temp/show.php?HTML_Progress.php (end of script) That's all for now Thanks again a lot for this very useful tools Laurent