Last try on package HTML_Progress and HTML_SetupWizard proposals
| From: | Laurent Laville | Date: | Wed, 23 Jul 2003 22:39:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Last try on package HTML_Progress and HTML_SetupWizard proposals | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-18606@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi all!
I do not really think that you'd like to have my classes on PEAR, because
so few people took a vote or gave me a feedback in past. But I'll have a
last try...
I've put online for both class HTML_Progress and HTML_SetupWizard :
- all source code online
- API doc (generated by phpDocumentor 1.2.1)
- my own doc/tutorial (even if not yet completly finished for
HTML_SetupWizard: demos guides are missing)
and of course :
- tarball with package.xml file (easy to install on PEAR)
- all others ressources as tarball too
You've only one URL to remember now and perharps for next days :
http://farell.free.fr/en/pear/sources/
I would like to give special thanks, for their particpation in past, to :
HTML_SetupWizard package proposal :
- Arnaud Limbourg
- Juan C Riviera
- Alexey Borzov
> I have questions about HTML_SetupWizard although. It looks not like a PEAR
> package as we know them, but more like an application. This is not a
problem in
> itself, as 'A' in 'PEAR' stands for 'Application', but I'd
> like to ask: is
it
> possible to modularize the thing?
-Martin Jansen to gave me a vote on June,25
> I still think that your package is somehow redundant to OOH_Forms, but
> you're right that OOH_Forms hasn't released any stuff yet and doesn't
> seem to be pretty active. Apart from that you seem to have chosen a
> slightly different approach and you seem to have a different goal than
> HTML_OOH_Forms.
>
> Thus I think that I'm +1 on it, unless someone brings up some valid
> points speaking against your proposal
HTML_Progress package proposal :
- Klaush Guenther to gave me a vote +1 on May,30
- Hans Lellelid to help me to find a major problem
- Joshua Eichorn
- Alexey Borzov to gave me a vote +1 on June,25
> As the code isn't published yet, I can make any judgements based on
presenations
> only. Well, HTML_Progress looks cool and will probably be useful in lots
of
> situations, so +1 here.
And for help me to finish on a MDB usage problem (table prefix in a DB
schema)
- Lukas Smith
Resume:
HTML_Progress +2
HTML_SetupWizard +1
Now it's up to you to choose : anyway i'll keep continue to work on this
project
and i'll answer to all mail (need help or simple question) posted at
laurent.laville@worldonline.fr
Laurent Laville