Re: Last try on package HTML_Progress and HTML_SetupWizard proposals

Josh Author of HTML_CSS is Klaus Gunther, and as there are no release yet i've uploaded a copy on my own. Details and links to download all dependencies are on the online doc. Please, take a time to read it. Of course my english is not so good but i hope this doc draft will be enough for all starting questions . Regards Laurent "Joshua Eichorn" <jeichorn@joshuaeichorn.com> a écrit dans le message de news: 3F1F130E.9080400@joshuaeichorn.com... > I can't get HTML_Progress to work looks like it needs HTML_CSS. Is this > another package you've been working on or is there some other package it > comes from, in which case you need to update your package.xml file to > require the correct version of the package. > -josh > Laurent Laville wrote: > > >Hi all! > > > >I do not really think that you'd like to have my classes on PEAR, because > >so few people took a vote or gave me a feedback in past. But I'll have a > >last try... > > > >I've put online for both class HTML_Progress and HTML_SetupWizard : > >- all source code online > >- API doc (generated by phpDocumentor 1.2.1) > >- my own doc/tutorial (even if not yet completly finished for > >HTML_SetupWizard: demos guides are missing) > > > >and of course : > >- tarball with package.xml file (easy to install on PEAR) > >- all others ressources as tarball too > > > >You've only one URL to remember now and perharps for next days : > >http://farell.free.fr/en/pear/sources/ > > > > > >I would like to give special thanks, for their particpation in past, to : > > > >HTML_SetupWizard package proposal : > >- Arnaud Limbourg > >- Juan C Riviera > >- Alexey Borzov > > > > > >>I have questions about HTML_SetupWizard although. It looks not like a PEAR > >>package as we know them, but more like an application. This is not a > >> > >> > >problem in > > > > > >>itself, as 'A' in 'PEAR' stands for 'Application', but > >>I'd like to ask: is > >> > >> > >it > > > > > >>possible to modularize the thing? > >> > >> > > > >-Martin Jansen to gave me a vote on June,25 > > > > > >>I still think that your package is somehow redundant to OOH_Forms, but > >>you're right that OOH_Forms hasn't released any stuff yet and doesn't > >>seem to be pretty active. Apart from that you seem to have chosen a > >>slightly different approach and you seem to have a different goal than > >>HTML_OOH_Forms. > >> > >>Thus I think that I'm +1 on it, unless someone brings up some valid > >>points speaking against your proposal > >> > >> > > > > > >HTML_Progress package proposal : > >- Klaush Guenther to gave me a vote +1 on May,30 > >- Hans Lellelid to help me to find a major problem > >- Joshua Eichorn > >- Alexey Borzov to gave me a vote +1 on June,25 > > > > > >>As the code isn't published yet, I can make any judgements based on > >> > >> > >presenations > > > > > >>only. Well, HTML_Progress looks cool and will probably be useful in lots > >> > >> > >of > > > > > >>situations, so +1 here. > >> > >> > > > > > >And for help me to finish on a MDB usage problem (table prefix in a DB > >schema) > >- Lukas Smith > > > > > >Resume: > >HTML_Progress +2 > >HTML_SetupWizard +1 > > > >Now it's up to you to choose : anyway i'll keep continue to work on this > >project > >and i'll answer to all mail (need help or simple question) posted at > >laurent.laville@worldonline.fr > > > > > >Laurent Laville > > > > > > > > > > > > > >