Re: Last try on package HTML_Progress and HTML_SetupWizard proposals

I can't get HTML_Progress to work looks like it needs HTML_CSS. Is this another package you've been working on or is there some other package it comes from, in which case you need to update your package.xml file to require the correct version of the package. -josh Laurent Laville wrote:

Hi all! I do not really think that you'd like to have my classes on PEAR, because so few people took a vote or gave me a feedback in past. But I'll have a last try... I've put online for both class HTML_Progress and HTML_SetupWizard : - all source code online - API doc (generated by phpDocumentor 1.2.1) - my own doc/tutorial (even if not yet completly finished for HTML_SetupWizard: demos guides are missing) and of course : - tarball with package.xml file (easy to install on PEAR) - all others ressources as tarball too You've only one URL to remember now and perharps for next days : http://farell.free.fr/en/pear/sources/ I would like to give special thanks, for their particpation in past, to : HTML_SetupWizard package proposal : - Arnaud Limbourg - Juan C Riviera - Alexey Borzov

I have questions about HTML_SetupWizard although. It looks not like a PEAR package as we know them, but more like an application. This is not a

problem in

itself, as 'A' in 'PEAR' stands for 'Application', but I'd like to ask: is

it

possible to modularize the thing?

-Martin Jansen      to gave me a vote on June,25
 

I still think that your package is somehow redundant to OOH_Forms, but you're right that OOH_Forms hasn't released any stuff yet and doesn't seem to be pretty active. Apart from that you seem to have chosen a slightly different approach and you seem to have a different goal than HTML_OOH_Forms. Thus I think that I'm +1 on it, unless someone brings up some valid points speaking against your proposal

HTML_Progress package proposal :

- Klaush Guenther    to gave me a vote +1  on May,30
- Hans Lellelid          to  help me to find a major problem

- Joshua Eichorn

- Alexey Borzov       to gave me a vote +1 on June,25
 

As the code isn't published yet, I can make any judgements based on presenations

only. Well, HTML_Progress looks cool and will probably be useful in lots

of

situations, so +1 here.

And for help me to finish on a MDB usage problem (table prefix in a DB schema) - Lukas Smith Resume:

HTML_Progress            +2
HTML_SetupWizard      +1

Now it's up to you to choose : anyway i'll keep continue to work on this project and i'll answer to all mail (need help or simple question) posted at laurent.laville@worldonline.fr Laurent Laville