Fwd: Re: [dev] Horde_Cipher et al;
| From: | Chuck Hagenbuch | Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2003 21:58:13 +0000 |
| Subject: | Fwd: Re: [dev] Horde_Cipher et al; | ||
| Groups: | php.pear.dev | ||
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-18768@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
FYI
----- Forwarded message from mike@graftonhall.co.nz -----
Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2003 10:00:30 +1200
From: Mike Cochrane <mike@graftonhall.co.nz>
Reply-To: Mike Cochrane <mike@graftonhall.co.nz>
Subject: Re: [dev] Horde_Cipher et al;
To: dev@lists.horde.org
> ----- Message from davey@php.net ---------
> >
> >The code is fine. What's needed is to identify any Horde dependencies and to
> get
> >them submitted to PEAR.
> >
> >I'd be very reluctant to submit them as seperate libraries, instead of as
> the
> >whole Cipher/Crypt packages.
> >
> The reason for this is that there is existing Crypt_* packages, and
> putting this into PEAR as-is would break that sort of, in that the
> existing packages are stand-alone and these are not. :Like I said, I
> like the idea of having it all in one, but it just doesn't fit into PEAR
> like that. I will bring this up on the pear-dev ML and see what they
> think should be done.
>
I would not support it if the Horde_Cipher class was split into seperate
packages.
The classes were never designed to work that way. Without the blockmode classes
the cipher classes are useless and vice-vera. You need both to be able to do
anything usefull.
Horde_Cipher currently depends on Crypt_Rc4 for RC4 encryption. Horde_Cipher
would obsolete Crypt_Crypt (never released) and Crypt_CBC.
- Mike :-)
--
Horde developers mailing list
Frequently Asked Questions: http://horde.org/faq/
To unsubscribe, mail: dev-unsubscribe@lists.horde.org
----- End forwarded message -----
-chuck
--
Charles Hagenbuch, <chuck@horde.org>
They're just looking at a wall of meat.