Re: [RFC] Horde_Cipher -> Crypt_Cipher

> Crypt_Cipher - Unified API for *ONLY* Encryption Methods > Crypt_Hash - Unified API *ONLY* for Hashing Methods That would be good imo. > This seems much more... verbose IMO. > > Anyways, just an RFC, I don't mind porting Horde_Cipher over in the ways > I've mentioned. > > One last thing, if this is done, should the various encryption drivers > provided with Horde_Cipher also be released as standalone packages so > that they can be used on their own like the current Crypt_* packages > aswell as with the Crypt_Cipher package... > > If that happens, it would *probably* be easiest to actually just write > my own abstraction class atop the single packages? I prefer the unified API way, that's just imho of course :) Arnaud.