Re: Package proposal: HTML_QuickForm_Controller
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Tue, 26 Aug 2003 23:46:35 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Package proposal: HTML_QuickForm_Controller | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-20592@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On 26 Aug 2003 at 23:39, Alexey Borzov wrote:
> Arnaud Limbourg wrote:
> > The code is clean (as usual). But i wonder, why does it have to be
> > released as a separate package since it only makes sense with
> > quickform (or i got it wrong ;) ?
>
> No, you got it right, it can be considered a subpackage of QuickForm.
> Reasons for a separate package: Main reason: This is beta quality code
> so the release schedule should be different from QuickForm (which is
> stable). Other reason: QuickForm is already BIG. Current CVS version
> has 40 *.php files not counting examples (release 3.1 has less). This
> code is not required for base QuickForm operations and thus can be
> kept in a separate package.
>
> Of course, if it is not accepted as a separate package, it will end up
> in QuickForm.
>
> Well, I suppose everyone is waiting for Bertrand's reaction, as lots
> of people apparently looked at the code and the demos but no one
> voted/commented yet. ;]
Basically I'm +1 for it and I'd like to see it as a separate package.
What do the others think?
Stefan