Re: Package proposal: HTML_QuickForm_Controller

Oops, only sent this to alexey. > Hi! > > Arnaud Limbourg wrote: > > The code is clean (as usual). But i wonder, why does it have to be > > released as a separate package since it only makes sense with quickform (or i got it wrong > > ;) ? > > No, you got it right, it can be considered a subpackage of QuickForm. Reasons > for a separate package: > Main reason: This is beta quality code so the release schedule should be > different from QuickForm (which is stable). > Other reason: QuickForm is already BIG. Current CVS version has 40 *.php files > not counting examples (release 3.1 has less). This code is not required for base > QuickForm operations and thus can be kept in a separate package. > > Of course, if it is not accepted as a separate package, it will end up in QuickForm. I would link that to the idea of subpackage greg suggested a short while ago (like yesterday or something). To me it looks like a very good case. If subpackages make it then i think it would fit, otherwise with the explanations you gave it makes sense to have a separate package. > Well, I suppose everyone is waiting for Bertrand's reaction, as lots of people > apparently looked at the code and the demos but no one voted/commented yet. ;] Arnaud.