Re: Re: New Package Proposal: File_Ogg

On 28 Aug 2003 at 17:45, Greg Beaver wrote: [...] > Otherwise, my cursory look says this is well-documented code. You > will probably benefit from subpackages when they get worked out, which > is happening right now. > > I have a conditional +1: commit to cvs, but don't do an initial > release without really great docs at pear.php.net (don't use existing > docs as a model :). I'm willing to be a doc beta-tester, as someone > who knows nothing about Ogg_Vorbis, but a bit about documentation. My > initial impression of Ogg_Vorbis is that it is an interesting > technology, but since nobody uses it yet, this is a problem. As a > professional musician myself, I'd like to see a short summary of the > problem that Ogg solves (just excerpt something from > http://www.xiph.org/about.html and link to it) in the > introduction to > the docs. Well Greg, I know you like docs very much - and I also agree with you they are useful. But I'd propose to do a alpha-release even if there is just inline-documentation. This is the case with many packages so far :-))) So I don't think we should hold David any longer - for a first release. In my oppinion David should go ahead and do a first release now the class itself is ready. He doesn't have to name it 1.0 already. Give him a chance to release his masterpiece for a first time :-) Stefan