Re: Re: Request for vote: HTTP_Status

On Sat Aug 30, 2003 at 04:4209AM -0400, Marshall Roch wrote: > Ok, I don't disagree with you, but I don't see any one package that it > fits well in. > > I'd say HTTP_Header because of the name, but that package is currently > designed to "set/modify HTTP-Headers." If we expand it to process > headers as well, then it might be a good solution. I don't see a problem in extending it's purpose. Did you already try to contact Wolfram? > Merging them the way > it stands now would mean including all of HTTP_Header without gaining > any benefit from it. Just to avoid confusion: You don't need to add your code to the main HTTP_Header class, but make it an independent file, just like Header/Cache.php. -- - Martin Martin Jansen http://martinjansen.com/