Re: Re: Request for vote: HTTP_Status

yep, i think this could be an extension to HTTP_Header, my +1 for putting it there just go ahead, once you have reached a common sense on the way to do it /me back from vacations :-) Martin Jansen wrote:

On Sat Aug 30, 2003 at 04:4209AM -0400, Marshall Roch wrote:

Ok, I don't disagree with you, but I don't see any one package that it fits well in. I'd say HTTP_Header because of the name, but that package is currently designed to "set/modify HTTP-Headers." If we expand it to process headers as well, then it might be a good solution.

I don't see a problem in extending it's purpose. Did you already try to contact Wolfram?

Merging them the way it stands now would mean including all of HTTP_Header without gaining any benefit from it.

Just to avoid confusion: You don't need to add your code to the main HTTP_Header class, but make it an independent file, just like Header/Cache.php.

-- Wolfram http://opensource.visionp.de ... authentication system .... http://sf.net/projects/auth