Re: Request for vote: HTTP_Status

Hi, The code is fine, but I don't see why this should be a separate package. This is more of a code snippet than a package - something that should be cut and pasted into a project rather than included as a file. I think you should talk to Wolfram and get HTTP_Status merged into HTTP_Header where it will be more appropriate. Alternately, it could be merged in the HTTP package, which Stig maintains, and is also pretty sparse. -1 for HTTP_Status as separate package. Greg Marshall Roch wrote:

It's been a few days, and discussion seems to have stopped about HTTP_Status. At this point, if no one has any additional comments, I'd like to get a vote on it. Proposal: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=106187955616734&w=2 Thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&w=2&r=1&s=http+status&q=b Package: http://www.exclupen.com/misc/pear/HTTP_Status-1.0.tgz Source: http://www.exclupen.com/misc/pear/HTTP/Status.phps The current standings are as follows: Stephan Schmidt: +1 Stefan Neufeind: +1 Alexey Borzov: -1, use switch() instead Alan Knowles: comments, no vote Greg Beaver: comments, no vote Thanks! -- Marshall Roch