Re: Request for comments on Unitests for Net_FTP

Sorry, for the lame last mail. I hit the button accidentally. <zitiere wer="Wolfram Kriesing"> > first thing, there was a discussion on pear-qa a week ago or so, about > passing i.e. a DB-DSN. I suggested that you can provide a simple > URL-GET parameter that the unittest needs, if not given either > fallback or show a warning. That would also be useable (with sligh > modifications) for later automatic tests, which are called via > commandline. Do you think, sending all those parameters through GET is comfortable? These are: a) host b) (port) c) user d) password e) file to upload f) file to download g) directory to upload h) directory to download Thats a bit to much I think, isn't it? > About testing the FTP if no server is available. Would Mock objects be > a help here? Might not be too easy to implement ... just a thought Sorry, I got no idea how to implement that, because the class uses PHPs internal FTP functions... :( -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2*5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2*23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>