Re: Request for comments on Unitests for Net_FTP

<zitiere wer="Wolfram Kriesing"> >>>first thing, there was a discussion on pear-qa a week ago or so, about >>>passing i.e. a DB-DSN. I suggested that you can provide a simple >>>URL-GET parameter that the unittest needs, if not given either >>>fallback or show a warning. That would also be useable (with sligh >>>modifications) for later automatic tests, which are called via >>>commandline. >> Do you think, sending all those parameters through GET is comfortable? >> These are: [snip] >> Thats a bit to much I think, isn't it? > wouldnt that be somehow like this: > url.php?dsn=user:password@host:port/directory > where the directory is a public directory, which means you need to be > able to up- and download to this dir. > You would of course have to upload the file first in order to download > it, which might not be perfect in this case, but wouldnt that work? > I am not to deep in it, just telling my thoughts :-) Maybe thats a solution... I'll think about that... Thanks for the idea! Regards, Toby. -- <?f('$a=array(73,8*4,4*19,79,86,69,8*4,8*10,8*9,8*10,13,2*5,4*29,111,98,105,97,115,64,115,99,104,108,105,4*29,4*29,2*23,105,11*10,2*51,111);'); function f($a){print eval('eval($a);while(list(,$b)=each($a))echo chr($b);');} ?>