Re: [PATCH] HTTP_request
| From: | Arnaud Limbourg | Date: | Wed, 01 Oct 2003 08:02:53 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] HTTP_request | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22250@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Reading this i think pear group should step up and make a decision concerning HTTP_Request. To me it looks like it needs a new maintainer
(temporary ?).
To avoid confusion i'm suggesting ading a new maintainer to the list, not removing the current maintainer and replacing him.
Arnaud.
moshe doron wrote:
"Alexey Borzov" <borz_off@cs.msu.su> wrote in message news:3F799E16.4040809@cs.msu.su...Hi! moshe doron wrote:yep i know, the first fix was send by me to the the maintainer 3 months ago without any feedback. this force me dividing my custom HTTP_Request. but now, we got the decision to work with pear where possible, so i trying again now. btw, i have also fix regrading the cookies parsing (support for name=name2=...=value format) but there is no point bothering backporting them into HTTP_Request where there is no active maintainer around. btw2, is HTTP_Request consider such unimportant? why not changing this poor status? i quite sure there are enough ppl aroud to take role. moshe.2. redirecting cookies.This works *correctly* with HTTP_Client. Good luck in pushing your other patch to HTTP_Request, BTW. There are many unapplied patches for it lying around and I'm not really sure whether it is maintained or not.