Re: [PATCH] HTTP_request
| From: | moshe doron | Date: | Wed, 01 Oct 2003 09:48:49 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] HTTP_request | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-22253@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
well considering the opportunity, that my work is not time wasting, i want
consulting the way dealing with HTTP code 100 (for now not implemented), and
may get the future maintainer ok ;)
first lets explain the cuurent status:
where 100 code return follow by e.g, 200, we get one stream like:
100 header\n
\n
200 header\n
\n
data
so to the HTTP_Request just ignore the real and integesting header and dirty
our data with 200 one.
my instinct is just droping the 100 header from the response and dealing
with the 200 one.
is this ok?
--
moshe.
"Arnaud Limbourg" <arnaud.limbourg.prestataire@cegetel.fr> wrote in message
news:3F7A8A2D.3070107@cegetel.fr...
> Reading this i think pear group should step up and make a decision
> concerning HTTP_Request. To me it looks like it needs a new maintainer
> (temporary ?).
>
> To avoid confusion i'm suggesting ading a new maintainer to the list,
> not removing the current maintainer and replacing him.
>
> Arnaud.