PEAR manual

Hi, as some of you may have noticed, I just commited a bunch of files to pearweb/public_html/manual. They are all generated from Docbook XML (the same way, the PHP manual is generated). Since we currently don't have a repository where I can commit the Docbook stuff, I've made it available at http://www.martin-jansen.de/pear/documentation/peardoc.tar.bz2 or http://www.martin-jansen.de/pear/documentation/peardoc.tar.gz . The archives include all the stuff that is necessary to build the docs. To build them, just run autoconf, ./configure and make. Now I would like to hear your opinion on this topics: 1.: Please tell me your criticism, your ideas, simply everything. 2.: How do you like the way the package documentations look (e.g. http://pear.php.net/manual/packages.auth.php)? The documentations are based on the skeleton by Alexander Merz; I changed them a bit, but the basic idea and most of the work has been done by him. 3.: If think we should create a new CVS module peardoc for the documentation, where the Docbook stuff, the Makefile etc. go to. Is this ok? - Martin