Re: [RFC] CVS directory structure

On Sat, 2003-11-15 at 16:13, Pierre-Alain Joye wrote: > > > I'm -1 on this. CVS is a tool for source control. Doing development > > > directly > > > on your CVS dir is a bad idea. > > That's exactly the point. CVS is initially made for developing inside > > it's checkout directories. That's just your local copy, which you will > > commit to the central repository. So copiing files away from your > > sandbox nd recopiing is double effort, without win. > Developing here == keeping files history, not run them. Nothing more. > pear install package.xml should be used, or a little bat to sync the dev > tree (your running script) and the cvs repo helps. These are all "littly dirty solutions" which were run over the years. What is so bad if you do - check out - change code - test - change code - test - commit instead of - check out - copy files - change code - test - change code - test - copy files - commit ??? -- http://www.schlitt.info http://www.schlitt.info/applications/blog