Re: XML_RPC Server Debug info

> Greg Beaver wrote and Marshall Roch replied: >> You should run it by Marshall and Stig, the two maintainers of XML_RPC. >> There are other issues with the implementation of XML_RPC (like the >> fact that the code needs some serious vacuuming) that might be good to >> take care of as well, to remove the experimental label. > > I don't see why it should not be removed. The PEAR version is stable, it's just the XML-RPC functions in PHP itself which are experimental. Maybe they are stable, but they're not documented and the manual has 'experimental ... use at your own risk' plastered all over it, so I don't really feel comfortable using them. > I have not had time to work on XML_RPC recently, but things are in the > works. The changes I've been planning to make will be fairly drastic > (no BC break, though), so it might be a good idea to move that into a > branch, or to make a branch for 1.0.4 so we can release small things > like this right away. Sounds good. Out of interest, what changes where you planning? > Mark, if you create a patch, I don't have a problem with it being > committed. No problem... I'm just working on the patch now and will test it out with a project we're working on at the moment. > Can anyone else advise on the best way to handle CVS? In what way? Best, Mark -- Mark Mitchenall, Standingwave Ltd Tel := +44 (0)20 8452 3031 Email := mark@standingwave.co.uk mark@mitchenall.com Home := http://www.standingwave.co.uk http://www.mitchenall.com