RE: [PEPr] Comment on XML::XML_XUL

Hi, > It would be better to at least remove the empty ones.. for the time > being.. (just stuff them in a 'if_needed') folder :).. I don't like the idea. That means I had two places to look for the schema of an element. And I'm planning to add functionality to mostly all of the elements. > I only found addTab on Tabbox.. - as there's so many files.. > it's a bit > of a chore looking through alot of them... You do not need to use all parameters of this method, you can use it as I did in the example by supplying a title and the content of the tab. But if you need to pass attributes to the tab or the tabpanel you may use the additional parameters... Yo this won't be changed. > does XUL have namespaces????? - I missed any reference to that on XUL > planet... Yes, it supports namespaces. You may use any NS for you XUL tags. This is needed when embedding XUL in HTML, or the other way round. Both is possible. > BTW - XML_XUL_INCLUDE_PATH has to go ;) Is there a rule for this? I copied this behaviour from Calendar, think's it's quite cool to test the new files in your devel environment... Stephan