RE: [PEAR-DEV] RE: [PEPr] Comment on XML::XML_XUL

On 23 Feb 2004 at 11:21, Stephan Schmidt wrote: > > I think it's been discussed before that we should try to avoid such > > "development workarounds" in the sources. Why don't you simply "pear > > install --force package.xml" your new files on the dev-machine? > That would mean I had to regenerate the package file everytime I added > a file... But before we start a new discussion on this, I'll simply > remove it. Didn't know that such workarounds are not allowed... "Not allowed" is maybe a bit too much. But you are *strongly* encouraged not to do it :-)) By the way: When working in CVS you're also strongly encouraged to have an up-to-date package.xml-file (not version-number and comments but at least the filelist for install). You can either do that by hand by simply adding every file you add at the time when you add it (as I do it) or by using the PackageFileManager (as Toby does it, look here for the script he uses: http://cvs.php.net/co.php/pear/Image_Text/generate_package_xml.php?r=1 .6) Hope that helps. Regards, Stefan PS: Despite such minor things, I'm really looking forward to having your package in the rep.