New releases for packages in CVS (was: Version Naming)
| From: | Stefan Neufeind | Date: | Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:04:40 +0000 |
| Subject: | New releases for packages in CVS (was: Version Naming) | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-25968@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
This is mostly the case if leads are waiting for some other fixes or
small new features to be introduced with the next version. However,
sometimes a new release is simply forgotten. And some fixes might in
the future also be done in CVS by PEAR QA without the package-lead
being actually involved (e.g. maybe because he didn't react for a
certain time). If you notice such packages, please feel free to send
a short email to pear-qa@lists.php.net. We'll take care of those
issues, if a new release is urgent or if the package-lead wasn't
available for a longer time.
Stefan
On 27 Feb 2004 at 10:08, Marcos Neves wrote:
> I agree.
>
> I would like to know if exist a rule to bring a cvs version to pear
> package. I mean, many packages has bugfixes at cvs but didn't update
> at pear. why?
>
> At 14:04 27/2/2004 +0100, Klaus Guenther wrote:
> >From: "Lukas Smith" <smith@backendmedia.com>
> >
> > > Marcos Neves wrote:
> > >
> > > > Excelent!!!
> > > > What about an expire date to every package be update.
> > > > I think one month is enouth.
> > >
> > > I have heard other people also say that they would prefer to have
> > > deadlines by which a given proposal must be applied to a given
> > > package. I dont think however that this is really necessary. What
> > > do other people think?
> >
> >One thing that would be rather important would be to determine a
> >proper api version method. Iirc, current methods usually rely on a
> >float, but it should probably be an array. I think it would be
> >helpful to require an apiVersion method for all packages, which
> >would, of course, require them to be updated pretty soon. There could
> >be a deadline set for that. But I don't think we need a deadline for
> >version changes -- current packages still work, even if there are
> >benefits to the new system.
> >
> >That said, it would be a good idea to wait until the handling for
> >ex-maintainers has been implemented before forcing new releases, so
> >that it can all be done in one swoop.