Re: Request for vote reactivation: Config_Registry

Hi all, I wouldn't started a flame-war. And if i've knew it will be such case, i'd avoid to propose a such package. Of course i was sad to have no reply from Chuck 2 days after his PEPr vote, (and sure discovered the PEPr bug : -1 without comment) but we fixed the situation with our private mails (me and Chuck). It was not in my attitude to smear Chuck, but you can (i hope) understand that i was disappointed that all arrived at same time : -1 vote (and no comment), vote duration = 2 days only The good new, is that we discovered a unknow bug in PEPr system ! Laurent ----------------------- PHP For Ever http://pear.php.net/user/farell "Klaus Guenther" <klaus@capitalfocus.org> a écrit dans le message de news: 00c801c40b34$2592a930$ac00a8c0@desk... > Hi Martin > > Due to technical problems, voting for Config_Registry was prematurely ended. > I'm not the only one who has called for a reactivation (see [1], [2] and > [3]). > > The failure report by the package author can be viewed at [4] > > Toby responded with a note that he would fix it. [5] He asked you to reopen > it. [6] So far, though, voting has not been reactivated. > > Klaus > > [1] > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=107761455620044&w=2 > [2] > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=107761488825962&w=2 > [3] > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=107761594706391&w=2 > > [4] > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=107640607001011&w=2 > > [5] > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=107640777602988&w=2 > [6] > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-dev&m=107762497919571&w=2