Re: [PEPr] Changes in proposal for SMS::SMS_Clickatell

From: Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 15:34:06 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Changes in proposal for SMS::SMS_Clickatell
Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-26538@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
Quoting Tobias Schlitt <tobias@schlitt.info>: > Sorry, I have no time to read your extensive mail glad to see you can guess the contents of my email to answer then. > A Net_SMS class has been proposed several times before yes and each time i've pointed out the fact that there is almost a complete solution available. > Regarding PEPr: The main knowledge base for PEAR is the mailinglist archive. > Searching for PEPr should give you all necessary information. PEPr is > neither a bda thing, nor invisible. i wasn't talking about PEPr being bad, the app is really nice actually! read the emails, don't pointlessly guess and fire back comments. i just have a problem with the whole workflow/approach/mentality to submitting and handling proposals > Just log in to pearweb. sure! what's the procedure again to *get* an account? back to the chicken-egg stuff. > Anyway, get in contact with the guys proposing. And if you still can not > find their mail adresses by searchung the archives find it here: > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=13 so now i have to email personally the guys who propose something? what's the point of the mailing lists then? this isn't an ego trip "use mine" etc. i couldn't care less who gets their package in, but i would like to see a decent Net_SMS package, especially now that it has been bounced around the lists for *months* without actually getting anywhere when the code *is* there. m.

« previous php.pear.dev (#26538) next »