Straw Poll on Version number x.y.z

As the only contensious issue on the Version naming RFC is the x.y.z rule. As it's a pretty small issue, and doesnt really justify a RFC of it's own - I'll just want to do a straw poll on it. Please Reply to the last email and add your name under your choice.. a) Add the rule that all version numbers should _ALWAYS_ use x.y.z format (eg. 1.0.0 - always have 3 points. as it's consistant, leaves no room for errors) b) Only require it on packages that release RC's, (eg. allow 1.1) Alan Knowles c) Dont care. Regards Alan -- Can you help out? Need Consulting Services or Know of a Job? http://www.akbkhome.com