Re: Straw Poll on Version number x.y.z
| From: | Firman Wandayandi | Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2004 07:52:14 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Straw Poll on Version number x.y.z | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27682@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Klaus Guenther <klaus@capitalfocus.org> wrote:
> Richard York <richy@smilingsouls.net> wrote:
>
> > Alan Knowles wrote:
> >
> > > As the only contensious issue on the Version naming RFC is the x.y.z
> > > rule. As it's a pretty small issue, and doesnt really justify a RFC of
> > > it's own - I'll just want to do a straw poll on it.
> > >
> > > Please Reply to the last email and add your name under your choice..
> > >
> > > a) Add the rule that all version numbers should _ALWAYS_ use x.y.z
> > > format (eg. 1.0.0 - always have 3 points. as it's consistant, leaves
no
> > > room for errors)
> >
> > Daniel Convissor
> > Richard York
> > Klaus Guenther
>
Firman Wandayandi
> > > b) Only require it on packages that release RC's, (eg. allow 1.1)
> > > Alan Knowles
> > >
> > > c) Dont care.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>