Re: Straw Poll on Version number x.y.z
| From: | Ian Eure | Date: | Thu, 15 Apr 2004 15:00:05 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Straw Poll on Version number x.y.z | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-27709@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Thursday 15 April 2004 12:52 am, Firman Wandayandi wrote:
> Klaus Guenther <klaus@capitalfocus.org> wrote:
> > Richard York <richy@smilingsouls.net> wrote:
> > > Alan Knowles wrote:
> > > > As the only contensious issue on the Version naming RFC is the x.y.z
> > > > rule. As it's a pretty small issue, and doesnt really justify a RFC
> > > > of it's own - I'll just want to do a straw poll on it.
> > > >
> > > > Please Reply to the last email and add your name under your choice..
> > > >
> > > > a) Add the rule that all version numbers should _ALWAYS_ use x.y.z
> > > > format (eg. 1.0.0 - always have 3 points. as it's consistant, leaves
>
> no
>
> > > > room for errors)
> > >
> > > Daniel Convissor
> > > Richard York
> > > Klaus Guenther
> > > Firman Wandayandi
>
Ian Eure