Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTML::HTML_Element

From: Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 16:24:19 +0000
Subject: Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTML::HTML_Element
References: 1 2 3  Groups: php.pear.dev 
Request: Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-28268@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message
On Apr 22, 2004, at 11:19 AM, Alan Knowles wrote:
Agreed that the HTML_Common API might use some updating. However, is it fair to use one developer's future plans as a reason to change a current proposed name from another developer? Under that model, I think it may become too easy to "squat" on a namespace indefinitely.
I guess what I'm saying is that if we are to allow someone to such a prime real estate, then it should offer a good alternative.. (even if I didnt do it ;)
An excellent point. I wish there was an easy and fair way to resolve it (to avoid something like the domain-name rush of the 90s.) Perhaps another RFC, to define reserved name spaces? ;-)
technically there is a bit of a precident for reserving names, or being carefull in allocating them....
Being careful is all I'm thinking about, really, especially when it comes to reasons. Perhaps PEAR group can define and clarify a position on this kind of sticky issue. -- Paul M. Jones Savant: the simple alternative to Smarty for PHP. http://phpsavant.com/ DB_Table: build RDBMS tables and HTML forms in one PHP class. http://wiki.ciaweb.net/yawiki/index.php?area=DB_Table Yawiki: a collaborative online documentation system. http://wiki.ciaweb.net/yawiki/index.php?area=Yawiki

« previous php.pear.dev (#28268) next »