Re: [PEPr] Comment on HTML::HTML_Element

"Pepr" <pear-sys@php.net> schrieb im Newsbeitrag news:20040422152042.57465.qmail@pb12.pair.com... > > Alan Knowles (http://pear.php.net/user/alan_k) has commented on the proposal for HTML::HTML_Element. > > Comment: > > I'm not too keen on this taking the HTML_Element namespace > - I did have some long term plan to propose this as HTML_Element (or for somebody else to volunteer) > http://pear.php.net/manual/en/package.html.html-template-flexy.element.html-template-flexy-element.php > > On the principle that the HTML_Common tree focuses on a private properties with setters approach to modelling, html elements, whereas H_T_F_Element focuses on a public accessor model. > > adding this as HTML_Common_Object which just extended HTML common, seems like a reasonable scope for the package.. - I dont know who is maintaining HTML_Common, but adding factory into that may be a good way to build on that model. > > I agree with Alan, extending HTML_Common is the best way to release the (currently called) HTML_Element. I´ll wrote a Mail to the Maintainers of the HTML_Common, Bertrand Mansion and Adam Daniel, to hear, what they thinking about. Marco Graetsch > > > > > Proposal information: > http://pear.php.net/pepr/pepr-proposal-show.php?id=56 > > -- > Sent by PEPr, the automatic proposal system at > http://pear.php.net