Re: Naming schemes

On Mon, 12 Nov 2001 11:47:49 +0100 "Martin Jansen" <mail@martin-jansen.de> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Nov 2001 22:09:58 -0500, Jon Parise wrote: > > >Some background: I'm probably the most responsbile person here > >for the majority of the PEAR standards. If you trace the > >history, you'll find the the PEAR coding standards are basically > >the Horde CODING_STANDARDS document, which Chuck and I put > >together some time ago. > > When we meet at the next PHP conference, I will really kick you > hard for _your_ coding standards :-). :) > Do you really think, that the naming convention is the only > problem, people have with the coding standards? Sig point of view ("core" stuff has to be strict) and Tomas (01/11/11 19:45) should be the final words. IMO, we can add additinnal modules must use already implemented functionnalities and not reinvent the wheel just because he do not like how the functionnality is (wrapper exists to solve long and hard code conversion, as a first step). This is the only way to get a stable and usefull core libs. > I'm afraid that if we now drop the naming conventions, people will come > up and will ask us to drop other things of the coding standards. Give your hand and lost your arm ;). pa