Re: Re: cvs: pear /Math_Numbers package.xml
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:44:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: cvs: pear /Math_Numbers package.xml | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-28515@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Lukas Smith wrote:
Daniel Convissor wrote:btw .. this regulation was never really enforced .. there are a fair amount of people opposed to it. these people should make sure that a new rfc is put to a vote (like alans proposal). regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07Hi Lukas: On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:20:25PM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:ah yes :-) i told him 1.0.1 beta on irc .. and yes you are right the state needs to be in the version name .. so 1.0.1beta1 is correctactually I told him to move to 1.0.1 betaOn the list, you said 1.0.0. Just to be clear to David, regardless of the number, the status for non-stable releases needs to be in the <version> as well.