Re: Re: cvs: pear /Math_Numbers package.xml
| From: | Lukas Smith | Date: | Thu, 29 Apr 2004 07:00:31 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: cvs: pear /Math_Numbers package.xml | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-28533@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Daniel Convissor wrote:
Hi Lukas: On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 10:44:44PM +0200, Lukas Smith wrote:No, you are correct. The reason was not that they were overcome, but that the alternative RFC was taking too long in the making. Anyways I really think that if so many people dont like this regulation they should come up with an alternative. Actually Alan already has, so maybe someone can help him out to finally finish his RFC so that it can be published an voted on. regards, Lukas Smith smith@backendmedia.com _______________________________ BackendMedia www.backendmedia.com berlin@backendmedia.com Linn Zwoch Smith GbR Pariser Str. 44 D-10707 Berlin Tel +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax +49 30 83 22 50 07btw .. this regulation was never really enforced .. there are a fair amount of people opposed to it.I recall someone (I believe you) mentioning on the list the other day that the disagreements were overcome and that the standard was in place. Perhaps I was crossing things in my brain.