Re: Phpdoc Package
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Wed, 02 Jun 2004 18:53:22 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Phpdoc Package | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-29923@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Joshua Eichorn wrote:
Tomas V.V.Cox wrote:IMO basically what it needs is a regulation, an RFC on how to depreciate a package (by Pear Group). Tomas V.V.Cox+1 for a big announce at its package home and three months later hide it at the web (will need a deprecated flag or something like so implemented). CVS code, ideally should be moved out the main PEAR tree for avoiding any confusion. As general rule, I'd propose that all abandoned packages with a healthy competitive package should follow the same fate. Tomas V.V.CoxSounds great let me know if you anything else from to go get this done, i'll start working on some patches for the manual so that gets fixed as well.