Re: PEAR_ErrorStack Quality
| From: | Greg Beaver | Date: | Sun, 04 Jul 2004 16:51:44 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: PEAR_ErrorStack Quality | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 | Groups: | php.pear.dev php.pear.qa |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-31570@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Aidan Lister wrote:
Are we going to underscore all good packages with PEAR_ then? Sorry, but I think this is highly stupid.What is your problem? This has nothing to do with other packages, and the name has been set for months. The package is an error stack that resides in PEAR and is a core component recommended for use by PEAR packages, so it is called PEAR_ErrorStack. You want to change the name because you think "PEAR_" will make people not want to use it. That is indeed highly stupid. Offense intended when I say: if you were thinking rather than saying ridiculous comments like the above, you'd see that the name is descriptive, and the quality of the package is what matters most. If you have any similar "constructive" criticisms like this message, please take them off-list until you have thought them through thorougly. I'm always happy to address any criticisms of the code's content, or design choices. Greg