Re: Re: PEAR_ErrorStack Quality

Aidan Lister wrote: >If you plan on making it a separate package, why would it still be >"Pear_ErrorStack"? > >I'd love to use ErrorStack like I use any other package (in non pear >projects), but I feel most other developers would not, as I would, because >it sounds like a PEAR internal class. I share the same opinion. I'd like to get rid of "require 'PEAR.php'" in all my scripts as I am only using it for errors. If there was a standalone package for error handling, without the need for the whole PEAR infrastructure, that would be cool. I get a lot of mails and read a lot of forum threads or blog entries where people are not using PEAR packages because of all the dependency there is with the main PEAR package. I think that those people would give PEAR a try if all they had to install was the common error class, instead of having to run go-pear etc, something they are sometimes not allowed to do anyway. Bertrand Mansion Mamasam