Re: HTTP_Session Alive?

"Tony Bibbs" <tony@tonybibbs.com> wrote in message news:40FD69B6.70901@tonybibbs.com... > Well, that doesn't make complete sense. Bugs? Sure, there are 3. > Regardless, I think it is safe to say the absense of bugs does not > indicate a stable package. And even if it were ready for primetime, I > would think one of the five maintainers would move it to stable. What's > PEAR's policies on orphaned packages? I'm not assuming this is > orphaned, just curious. I'll wait for any more responses to trickle in > before I try emailing the maintainers directly. > > --Tony Hi Tony, in March I submitted some new code to one of the maintainers. Unfortunately he has not found the time to take them into account yet. Some weeks ago one of the maintainers wrote something about a new realese, see here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=pear-doc&m=108413484729918&w=2 That was already more than two months ago, though... By the way, I'm using the package in production environments without any problems - especially the DB container. Regards, Torsten Roehr > > Robin Ericsson wrote: > > >On Tue, 2004-07-20 at 18:17, Tony Bibbs wrote: > > > > > >>HTTP_Session has much of what I need in a session management package but > >>it is marked as beta and hasn't been touched since March of 2003. Is > >>this dead? If not, can I get a quick status on where it is. I'm trying > >>to decide whether or not to use it or simply write my own. > >> > >> > > > >Check bugs, if there are no bugs, then maybe there are no bugs in the > >current version and a stable release can safely be released :) > > > > > >regards > >Robin > > > > > >