Re: Re: CVS folder to remove

On Tue, 17 Aug 2004, Alan Knowles wrote: > Just created > > Derick, this wasnt really Davids fault, there was a bit of confusion > over the naming, that was just overlooked by everybody, until it was a > bit late. I didn't say it was :) > .. Although I agree, there have been a few hickups. - it may be better > that new account requests only get access to their own package for the > time being. (That looks like what has been happening already anyway.) yes, but they can still use "import" as that's not protected by the karma stuff. > Do we have the resources to manage another CVS server specificly for > pear?? - is it worth seperating?? - perhaps something to discuss at > frankfurt in november? I think that's a bad idea, Wez' idea of using speckle or Goba's idea of patching out import might be a better solution. (I'd go for speckle) Derick