RE: [PEAR-DEV] DB_Light

Also I just love the sound of "automagically" in a readme :) I suggested making packages of methods so that we don't need that many require_once calls as those are slow Anyways I will bounce around the suggestions in my head as soon as I get a second to breath. Lukas Smith smith@dybnet.de _______________________________ DybNet Internet Solutions GbR Alt Moabit 89 10559 Berlin Tel. : +49 30 83 22 50 00 Fax : +49 30 83 22 50 07 www.dybnet.de info@dybnet.de _______________________________ > -----Original Message----- > From: Martin Jansen [mailto:mail@martin-jansen.de] > Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:41 PM > To: Lukas Smith > Cc: pear-dev@lists.php.net > Subject: RE: [PEAR-DEV] DB_Light > > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001 20:28:37 +0100, Lukas Smith wrote: > > >I just would prefer not to force the user to make this decision but to > >load this added functionality dynamically so the user only loads the > >code he actually uses. > > Yeah. If there is way to load parts of PEAR DB only when they are > needed, we should go this way. > > I don't think that it is basically a good idea to use two differents > classes (light and heavy), that can be used for the same purpose: > IMO lot's of people will then wonder, whether they need the light > or the heavy-weight class for their project. > > - Martin > > -- > Martin Jansen, <mail@martin-jansen.de> > http://www.martin-jansen.de/ >