Re: Re: Looking docs on a site. QA
| From: | Pierre-Alain Joye | Date: | Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:33:41 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Looking docs on a site. QA | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34270@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 13:21:39 +0300
borz_off@cs.msu.su (Alexey Borzov) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Lukas Smith wrote:
> > >> they are .. but all people who are actively interested are
> > >subscribed> to the QA mailinglist.
> > >
> > >
> > > I am definitely interested but am not subscribed to the QA
> > > (and am not interested in subscribing). Thus your "all"
> > > quantificator is wrong and discussion should continue here.
> >
> > ok let me rephrase ..
> > everybody who is actively interested should join the pear-qa
> > list.
>
> I think this particular discussion may be of interest to PEAR
> developers not generally interested in QA, since its outcome may
> potentially change the way they work with their packages.
Indeed.
> Besides, the QA team RFC was accepted half a year ago by PEAR
> developers and the core members were elected by PEAR developers.
> It would be fair if said QA team gave a brief overview on what was
> already done to make PEAR better and what is being done now.
You got it. Talk about a topic on the right list, and post a summary
of the discussions/decisions on the other lists or using the
proposal system if required (which could be the case here).
--Pierre