Re: Re: Looking docs on a site. QA
| From: | Alexey Borzov | Date: | Tue, 09 Nov 2004 10:21:39 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Looking docs on a site. QA | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34269@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Hi,
Lukas Smith wrote:
I think this particular discussion may be of interest to PEAR developers not generally interested in QA, since its outcome may potentially change the way they work with their packages. Besides, the QA team RFC was accepted half a year ago by PEAR developers and the core members were elected by PEAR developers. It would be fair if said QA team gave a brief overview on what was already done to make PEAR better and what is being done now.I am definitely interested but am not subscribed to the QA (and am not interested in subscribing). Thus your "all" quantificator is wrong and discussion should continue here. ok let me rephrase .. everybody who is actively interested should join the pear-qa list.they are .. but all people who are actively interested are subscribed to the QA mailinglist.