General Questions

Well, I'm trying to be an active PEAR member. Yesterday was day to remember for me :) NET_DNSBL was accepted, I wrote major parts of the package with Sebastian. Anyway, today I spent some time browsing the packages & the site, I compiled a list of questions: - Why are there packages marked stable when they don't have end user docs, even the auto generated API docs are non-sense( e.g. Text_Statistics ) - Some packages don't have any code released, not even in CVS. - There are some issues that really shock me when I see them in PEAR, e.g. using double quotes for strings that contain no variables or special chars. This is not a CS issue, it's a performance issue. If using variables in a double quoted string, that's another story, a CS issue. - The Main page for any package doesn't show the package dependencies. It shows a less relevant information, 'Packages that depend on package X' - Mainly end user documentation is really poor! - Is the source code of the PEAR's website open source? Where can I find it? - If you want to view the API documentation for some package, there's no way to go back to the main page, It's a minor naviagation issue. I hope I addressed the question to the correct list, maybe some issues need to go to QA. Ammar Ibrahim