Re: Re: Working Version of Net_Monitor - Please Review :)
| From: | Robert Peake | Date: | Thu, 09 Dec 2004 21:20:08 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Re: Working Version of Net_Monitor - Please Review :) | ||
| References: | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-34985@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
bertrand Gugger wrote:
200 is always an OK state.Having the code standard across all services (200 = OK, etc.) makes more sense than defining a unique numeric code for every type of service, since it becomes easier to see at-a-glance what is 200 (OK) and what is down (0). However, the actual messages returned by the various Net_* packages can be very useful in their own right, which is why they are included.So my service's 200 is bad state, what should I do ?
What about the other questions from my message ?Either I didn't understand them or didn't understand their relevance to the package. I am finding it difficult to know when you are trying to make a point and when you are being philosophical. -RP