Re: commercial use
| From: | Tomas V.V.Cox | Date: | Sun, 23 Dec 2001 21:53:27 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: commercial use | ||
| References: | 1 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-3684@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
Lukas Smith wrote:
>
> So there isn't a standard license?
The license is a choose of the author of the class.
> How are differences in licensing of packages that make use of other
> packages documented?
>
> That is how do I know that a package does not contain parts that are
> under a different (more restrictive) license?
Looking at the licenses of the packages listed in the package
dependencies.
> Is there a requirement to
> document this?
No, but could be recommended.
> Also are licenses at all considered (especially when it comes to
> duplicate packages) when being included in PEAR?
Only open source licenses are allowed in PEAR.
Tomas V.V.Cox