Re: [PEPr] Comment on Math::Math_Finance

--- Martin Jansen <mj@php.net> wrote: > On Mon Mar 28, 2005 at 06:3136PM -0000, Matthew Fonda wrote: > > I have not looked at the code yet (it would be nice to have .phps), > > That's what I thought, too. What do you guys think of making .phps > files mandatory for future proposals? A "good thing" (TM) IMHO. In particular for packages with complex structure or that do some complicated manipulations, being able to see the code as .phps makes life easier, and allows each one to see the bits he/she groks best w/o needing to get the whole tarball (a boon now that I am in a place with limited bandwith). Cheers. -- Jesus M. Castagnetto (jcastagnetto@yahoo.com) Web site: http://www.castagnetto.org/ Research: http://metallo.scripps.edu/ PEAR stuff: http://pear.php.net/user/jmcastagnetto __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com