Re: Status of Validate
| From: | Torsten Roehr | Date: | Mon, 04 Apr 2005 10:36:46 +0000 |
| Subject: | Re: Status of Validate | ||
| References: | 1 2 | Groups: | php.pear.dev |
| Request: | Send a blank email to pear-dev+get-37069@lists.php.net to get a copy of this message | ||
"Helgi Þormar" <helgi@trance.is> wrote in message
news:1112554624.5470.38.camel@megatokyo...
> On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 20:42 +0200, Torsten Roehr wrote:
> > Hi devs,
> >
> > what's the current status of Validate?
> >
> > A lot of bugs have been closed since the last release (2004-03-17):
> >
http://pear.php.net/bugs/search.php?search_for=&boolean=0&limit=10&order_by=
> >
&direction=ASC&cmd=display&status=Closed&bug_type=All&package_name%5B%5D=Val
> >
idate&php_os=&phpver=&assign=&maintain=&author_email=&bug_age=0&bug_updated=
> > 0
> > (ignore the first one)
> >
> > So maybe it's time to (at least) release a beta version (maybe even
stable
> > if PEAR allows jumping from alpha to stable). I think that a lot of
people
> > are scared off by the "alpha" tag. I've been using the 0.4.1 release
> > successfully in a lot of projects and would really like to see a new
> > release.
> >
> > If there is demand I would be happy to write unit tests for the current
CVS
> > version.
> >
> > I remember that some weeks ago it was discussed to split Validate into
> > different packages. What's the status with that?
> >
> > Any comments are greatly appreciated!
Hi Helgi,
thanks for your quick response. Please see my comments below.
> Can't remember if we posted about this here, but we are splitting
> Validate into smaller packages and as you see most of those things have
> unit testing but some are lacking and some need just extra love (read as
> more data to throw at it)
I'll take a look and maybe add some test data.
> The splitting is all done and I even wrote some unit tests so we're in
> very good shape but there is one or two bugs still left and both I and
> Pierre and Stefan are very busy at the moment so it has to wait unless
> someone else (*hint*Torsten*hint*) steps in and takes care of those
> things.
>
> The multiple function would be one thing that might need some attention
> after the split up.
I'll take a look at this as well.
> Anyway knock ya self out and see what you can do, just file bug
> reports/feature reports if you do anything with links to unified diffs
> and etc. :-)
I've just created a diff for one of the two open requests (incl. extended
unit test):
http://pear.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=997 (URIs
to the diffs/files can be
found in the comments)
Best regards, Torsten
> You can post all questions here also if there are any additional things
> you need to know! :)
>
> - Helgi